Authors
Juliana Gutiérrez
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Abstract
Johannes Kepler dedicated much of his work to discover a law for the refraction of light. Unfortunately, he formulated an incorrect law. Nevertheless, it was useful for anticipating the behavior of light in some specific conditions. Some believe that Kepler did not have the elements to formulate the law that was later accepted by the scientific community, that is, the Snell–Descartes law. However, in this paper, we propose a model that agrees with Kepler’s heuristics and that is also successful in anticipating the behavior of light when it passes through a surface that separates two media with different optical densities. This model adopts strategies that were recommended by Kepler in two types of analogies. The obstacles that led to the failure of the two types of analogies are presented in the article, and we argue that the model proposed here could overcome these specific obstacles. Finally, we show how the proposed model could be articulated with Kepler’s metaphysics of light.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s00407-019-00236-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Euclidean Diagram.Kenneth Manders - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press. pp. 80--133.
Theories of Light From Descartes to Newton.A. I. Sabra - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):291-293.
Methodological Aspects of Kepler's Theory of Refraction.Gerd Buchdahl - 1972 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3 (3):265.
Thomas Harriott.Johs Lohne - 1959 - Centaurus 6 (2):113-121.
Kepler: Analogies in the Search for the Law of Refraction.Carlos Alberto Cardona - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:22-35.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kepler and the Telescope.Antoni Malet - 2003 - Annals of Science 60 (2):107-136.
Kepler: Analogies in the Search for the Law of Refraction.Carlos Alberto Cardona - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:22-35.
The Development of Mersenne's Optics.Daniele Cozzoli - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (1):pp. 9-25.
Kepler’s Optics Without Hypotheses.Sven Dupré - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):501-525.
Kepler's Relation to the Jesuits—A Study of His Correspondence with Paul Guldin.Georg Schuppener - 1997 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 5 (1):236-244.
Binocular Vision and Image Location Before Kepler.Robert Goulding - 2018 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 72 (5):497-546.
The Cause of Refraction in Medieval Optics.David C. Lindberg - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):23-38.
Constructing Copernicus.Peter Barker - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Kepler’s Theory of the Soul: A Study on Epistemology.Jorge M. Escobar - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):15-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-04

Total views
4 ( #1,192,242 of 2,374,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #204,926 of 2,374,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes