A Theory of Just Market Exchange

Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (1):91-118 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Any plausibly just market exchange must balance two conflicting moral considerations: non-worseness (Wertheimer, 1999) and euvoluntariness (true voluntariness; Munger, 2011). We propose an analytical theory of just market exchange that partly resolves this conflict.

Similar books and articles

Euvoluntary or not, exchange is just*: Michael C. munger.Michael C. Munger - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):192-211.
On the Market Rule and Related Institutional Arrangement.Yin-Xing Hong - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):5-11.
Preferences, beliefs, and heuristics.Toshio Yamagishi - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):836-837.
Traders’ Engagement with Markets.Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger - 2002 - Theory, Culture and Society 19 (5-6):161-185.
Commutative justice.David Mildenberger Carl - 2016 - Dissertation, St. Andrews
Global Derivatives Market.Aleksandra Stankovska - 2016 - Seeu Review 12 (1):81-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-07

Downloads
500 (#32,090)

6 months
165 (#13,929)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Munger
Duke University

Citations of this work

The just price and the gains from exchange.Pietro Maffettone - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (8):1057-1074.
The just price and the gains from exchange.Pietro Maffettone - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (8):1057-1074.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - New York, US: OUP Usa. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland.
Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.
Risking and Wronging.Rahul Kumar - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1):27-51.
Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination.Nicholas Vrousalis - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2):131-157.

View all 26 references / Add more references