On Making the Same Choice Eternally: A Reply to Davis

Sophia 50 (4):693-696 (2011)
In this brief reply to Stephen Davis, I argue that Davis’s separationist position, wherein those who remain eternally apart from God do so by choice, is internally contradictory in that it leads to universalism
Keywords Universalism  Separationism  Hell  Subjective Probability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-011-0244-6
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,634
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
It Depends on What One Means by “Eternal”: Why Boethius is Not an Eternalist.Michael Wiitala - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:253-261.
The World-Shift Theory of Free Choice.Wayne A. Davis - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):206-211.
Loptson on Anselm and Davis.Stephen T. Davis - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (3):245 - 249.
Anselm and Question-Begging: A Reply to William Rowe. [REVIEW]Stephen T. Davis - 1976 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):448 - 457.
Warner on Enjoyment.Wayne A. Davis - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:553-555.
Reply to Davis.E. J. Lowe - 1980 - Analysis 40 (4):187 - 190.
Reply to Critics.Theodore M. Drange - 2005 - Philo 8 (2):169-182.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
17 ( #327,646 of 2,236,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,600 of 2,236,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature