Religious Studies 45 (4):487-493 (2009)

In ’The Coherence of Theism’ Richard Swinburne writes that a person cannot be omniscient and perfectly free. In ’The Existence of God’ Swinburne writes that God is a person who is omniscient and perfectly free. There is a straightforward reason why the two passages are not in tension, but recognition of this reason raises a problem for Swinburne’s argument in ’The Existence of God’ (the conclusion of which is that God likely exists). In this paper I present the problem for Swinburne’s argument. I then consider two potential responses and suggest that neither succeeds
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990217
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,095
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24.
The Intrinsic Probability of Theism.Calum Miller - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (10):e12523.
God as the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:3-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
86 ( #119,345 of 2,427,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #229,124 of 2,427,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes