Richard Swinburne's argument to the simplicity of God via the infinite

Religious Studies 45 (4):487-493 (2009)
Authors
Abstract
In ’The Coherence of Theism’ Richard Swinburne writes that a person cannot be omniscient and perfectly free. In ’The Existence of God’ Swinburne writes that God is a person who is omniscient and perfectly free. There is a straightforward reason why the two passages are not in tension, but recognition of this reason raises a problem for Swinburne’s argument in ’The Existence of God’ (the conclusion of which is that God likely exists). In this paper I present the problem for Swinburne’s argument. I then consider two potential responses and suggest that neither succeeds
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990217
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,507
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Intrinsic Probability of Theism.Calum Miller - forthcoming - Philosophy Compass.
God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24.
God as the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:3-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-10-25

Total downloads
66 ( #94,582 of 2,268,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #211,649 of 2,268,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature