Richard Swinburne's argument to the simplicity of God via the infinite

Religious Studies 45 (4):487-493 (2009)
In ’The Coherence of Theism’ Richard Swinburne writes that a person cannot be omniscient and perfectly free. In ’The Existence of God’ Swinburne writes that God is a person who is omniscient and perfectly free. There is a straightforward reason why the two passages are not in tension, but recognition of this reason raises a problem for Swinburne’s argument in ’The Existence of God’ (the conclusion of which is that God likely exists). In this paper I present the problem for Swinburne’s argument. I then consider two potential responses and suggest that neither succeeds
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990217
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24.
God as the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:3-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
64 ( #94,004 of 2,235,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,087 of 2,235,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature