Young and Restless

This article argues that Maritain’s philosophy of human intellection was more indebted to Bergson’s views on the centrality of intuition, metaphysics, andthe instrumental character of scientific reason, than some of Maritain’s published criticisms of Bergson might lead one to believe. Toward the end of his life Maritain spoke of twentieth-century Thomism’s debt to Bergson
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/acpq201084336
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,664
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas Gwozdz (1999). Derrida, Maritain, and Deconstruction. International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):305-316.
H. Bergson (1910). A Propos d'Un Article de Mr. Walter B. Pitkin Intitulé: ``James and Bergson''. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (14):385-388.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

42 ( #114,091 of 1,903,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

33 ( #14,161 of 1,903,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.