Axiomathes 27 (5):491-501 (2017)

Brentano’s views on psychology influenced the way philosophy was made at the beginning of the 20th century. But did this influence spread as far as to give place to Freud’s revolutionary discovery of the psychoanalytical unconscious? There are reasons to believe that Brentano had a profound influence on Freud. An attentive analysis of Freud’s vocabulary as well as his arguments against “philosophical” objections supports this point rather convincingly. However, Freud was not a philosopher and Brentano’s historical influence does not suffice to transform the Freudian unconscious in a philosophical concept. It is the purpose of this paper to sketch a way to make a philosophical use of Freud’s unconscious by reconstructing the dialogue between Brentano and Freud on a conceptual level. Despite the explicit critique of the unconscious that we find in Brentano’s Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, I show that Freud never truly opposed Brentano. He rather took Brentano’s descriptive psychology a step further: he introduced a dynamic component to the analysis of the psyche that is complementary to Brentano’s descriptive psychology and could be considered a type of genetic psychology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-017-9347-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Interpretation of Dreams.Sigmund Freud & A. A. Brill - 1900 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (20):551-555.
Descriptive Psychology.Franz Brentano - 1982/1995 - Routledge.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Que Peut Freud Que Brentano Ne Peut Pas?Hamid Taieb - 2019 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 2:183-201.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Brentano's Psychology From an Empirical Standpoint and Freud's Early Metapsychology.R. E. Fancher - 1977 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 13:207-227.
The Philosophy of Brentano.Linda L. McAlister (ed.) - 1976 - Humanities Press.
Brentano and Aesthetic Intentions.Lynn Pasquerella - 1992 - Brentano Studien 4:235-249.
Franz Brentano on the Ontology of Mind.Kevin Mulligan & Barry Smith - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (4):627-644.
Brentano on Intentionality.Tim Crane - 2017 - In U. Kriegel (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 41-48.
Brentano and Comte.Dieter Münch - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36:33-54.
Descriptive Psychology.Franz Brentano - 1982/1995 - Routledge.
Franz Brentano, Freud's Philosophical Mentor.A. Cohen - 2002 - In Gertrudis Van de Vijver & Filip Geerardyn (eds.), The Pre-Psychoanalytic Writings of Sigmund Freud. Karnac Books. pp. 88--100.
Hitchcock's Conscious Use of Freud's Unconscious.Constantine Sandis - 2009 - Europe's Journal of Psychology 3:56-81.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #478,332 of 2,533,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #388,784 of 2,533,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes