Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):867-868 (2003)

Paul Gyllenhammer
St. John's University
Centered on the question of normativity and ethics, neuroscientist Jean-Pierre Changeux and philosopher Paul Ricoeur engage in a lively and informative dialogue. They share a common insight concerning ethics, but let us first look at some of their differences.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Animal: Virtue, Vice, and Human Nature.Christian Miller, Berlin Heather & Shermer Michael - 2016 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:39-56.
Informed Consent in the Human Genome Enterprise.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):296.
Consciousness, Free Action and the Brain.John R. Searle - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (10):3-22.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,507,866 of 2,454,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes