Philosophy 51 (196):159-176 (1976)

Abstract
It is commonly supposed that the philosophy of education is not a reputable area of concern for a philosopher. I have never heard a coherent, sustained and successful case made for this view. Only vague remarks about ‘autonomy’ and narrowly protectionist views of philosophy are ventured. So I shall not discuss the matter further. I shall simply be content to side with Plato, Aristotle, Comenius, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Mill and Dewey, who thought that educational issues fell within the province of philosophy. Kant was so concerned with education that he interrupted his work on the Critique of Pure Reason in order to support Basedow's experimental school, the Philanthropin, and the educational reforms which it intended to institute. Kant says ‘… the greatest and most difficult problem to which man can devote himself is the problem of education.’ But if those who hold that the philosophy of education is unimportant, or even disreputable, have come to that view after examining a good deal of what is currently being said in this field, then their adverse reaction is not hard to understand, because a good deal of contemporary work here is clearly inadequate. I hope to show that the contemporary perspective is too narrow, and to advocate a return to a more traditional view of the philosophy of education in the hope that the subject may once again be given the importance which was formerly attributed to it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100020581
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Revolutions in English Philosophy and Philosophy of Education.Peter Gilroy - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (2):202-218.
Analyticity, Meaning, and Education: A Critique of a Quinean Dogma.R. A. Goodrich - 1996 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 28 (2):27–41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

R. S. Peters and J. H. Newman on the Aims of Education.Jānis T. Ozoliņš - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (2):153-170.
Education and the Good Life.Robin Haack - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (217):289 - 302.
Philosophies of Education.R. J. Haack - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (196):159 - 176.
Can Kant Have an Account of Moral Education?Kate A. Moran - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):471-484.
Ambidextrous Scholarship: A Review Essay.Stephanie Mackler - 2005 - Educational Theory 55 (4):461-477.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
29 ( #364,718 of 2,427,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes