Mind 85 (337):112-119 (1976)

Abstract
It is often taken for granted by writers who propose--and, for that matter, by writers who oppose--'justifications' of inductions, that deduction either does not need, or can readily be provided with, justification. The purpose of this paper is to argue that, contrary to this common opinion, problems analogous to those which, notoriously, arise in the attempt to justify induction, also arise in the attempt to justify deduction.
Keywords Logic  Deduction  justification
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 00264423, 14602113
DOI 10.1093/mind/LXXXV.337.112
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,666
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Supervaluationism and Its Logics.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):633-676.
On the Justification of Deduction and Induction.Franz Huber - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (3):507-534.
Sophism and Pragmatism.Nicholas Shackel - 2010 - Logique Et Analyse 53 (210):131-149.
Non-Deductive Methods in Mathematics.Alan Baker - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
538 ( #10,362 of 2,349,157 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #39,070 of 2,349,157 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes