Sheldon Krimsky: A Peer without Peer

Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):631-633 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry.David Shatz - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
The ethics of peer review in bioethics.David Wendler & Franklin Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1272-1283,.
Understanding Peer to Peer as a Relational Dynamics.Michel Bauwens - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15:41-51.
A Code of Conduct for Peer Reviewers and Editors.Steven James Bartlett - 2019 - Willamette University Faculty Research Website.
The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science.Franz A. Foltz - 2000 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 20 (6):427-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-08

Downloads
4 (#1,584,643)

6 months
3 (#1,002,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ed Hackett
University of Akron

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment.Sheldon Krimsky - 2015 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (6):883-914.

Add more references