The Ambivalence of Peer Review: Thank You ST&HV Reviewers 2019-2020

Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (4):687-694 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Code of Conduct for Peer Reviewers and Editors.Steven James Bartlett - 2019 - Willamette University Faculty Research Website.
Jury Theorems for Peer Review.Marcus Arvan, Liam Kofi Bright & Remco Heesen - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Advances in peer review research: an introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.Jennifer A. Byrne - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
The problem of humiliation in peer review.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2014 - Ethics and Education 9 (2):141-156.
The ethics of peer review in bioethics.David Wendler & Franklin Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-05

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ed Hackett
University of Akron

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Essential Tension.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):649-652.

Add more references