Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (2):165-177 (2009)
In this paper I bring together self-defense theory and animal rights theory. The extension of self-defense theory to animals poses a serious problem for proponents of animal rights. If, in line with orthodox self-defense theory, a person is a legitimate target for third-party self-defensive violence if they are responsible for a morally unjustified harm without an acceptable excuse; and if, in line with animal rights theory, people that consume animal products are responsible for unjustified harm to animals, then many millions, if not billions, of otherwise law abiding and decent people will be legitimate targets for third-party self-defense violence on behalf of animals. I call this problem: the multiple inappropriate targets problem for animal rights.
|Keywords||Animal rights Self-defense Just war theory Moral responsibility Ethics McMahan Violence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals.Josephine Donovan & Carol J. Adams (eds.) - 1996 - Continuum.
Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue.Deborah Slicer - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):108-124.
Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion.John M. Kistler - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals.Carol J. Adams - 1994 - Continuum.
Animal Century: A Celebration of Changing Attitudes to Animals.Mark Gold - 1998 - J. Carpenter.
People Promoting and People Opposing Animal Rights: In Their Own Words.John M. Kistler - 2002 - Greenwood Press.
Added to index2009-02-18
Total downloads218 ( #17,744 of 2,172,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #36,382 of 2,172,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?