Bohr's atomic model and paraconsistent logic

Abstract
Bohr’s atomic model is one of the better known examples of empirically successful, albeit inconsistent, theoretical schemes in the history of physics. For this reason, many philosophers use this model to illustrate their position for the occurrence and the function of inconsistency in science. In this paper, I proceed to a critical comparison of the structure and the aims of Bohr’s research program – the starting point of which was the formulation of his model – with some of its contemporary philosophical readings. My study comes to conclude that the attempt of certain philosophers to accommodate Bohr’s model to a form of paraconsistent logic obliterates essential aspects of scientists' actual practice and reasoning.
Keywords Bohr's atomic model  paraconsistent logic  scientific methodology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Kantian Framework of Complementarity.Michael Cuffaro - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (4):309-317.
Niels Bohr and the Vienna Circle.Jan Faye - 2010 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14:33-45.
Paraconsistent Logic and Model Theory.Elias H. Alves - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):17 - 32.
Quantum Frames.Matthew J. Brown - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45 (1):1-10.
An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos' Account of the 'Degenerating Phase' of Bohr's Atomic Theory.Hans Radder - 1982 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):99-109.
The First Subatomic Explanations of the Periodic System.Helge Kragh - 2001 - Foundations of Chemistry 3 (2):129-143.
Added to PP index
2010-03-21

Total downloads
17 ( #293,593 of 2,202,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature