The numerical limit of perception

In this paper I will try to determine the numerical limits of perception and observation in general. Unlike most philosophers who wrote on perception, I will treat perception from a quantitative point of view and not discuss its qualitative features. What I mean is that instead of discussing qualitative aspects of perception, like its accuracy, I will discuss the quantitative aspects of perception, namely its numerical limits. As it turns out, the number of objects one is able perceive is finite, while the number of objects our mind can imagine might be infinite. Thus there must be a level of infinity by which the ‘number’ of objects our mental world can host is bounded. I will use both philosophical assumptions and observations, and mathematical analysis in order to get an estimate of the ‘number’ of objects we could possibly perceive, which surprisingly turns out to be the first level of infinity or the number of natural numbers. I will start by discussing the nature of concrete objects and the way we access them via perception. I will talk about mathematics as well and its relation with perception in order to justify myself for using mathematics as a tool in this paper. After some sections of discussions of various aspects of perception and imagination, I will finally be ready to make a counting and determine what I called “the numerical limits of perception”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Representing the Impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Perception and Belief.A. D. Smith - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):283-309.
Camouflaged Physical Objects.Manuel Liz - 2006 - Theoria 21 (2):165-184.
What Perception is Doing, and What It is Not Doing, in Mathematical Reasoning.Dennis Lomas - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):205-223.
The Nature of Perception.John A. Foster - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Object Perception: Vision and Audition.Casey O'Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Three Grades of Immediate Perception: Thomas Reid's Distinctions.Todd Buras - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):603–632.
Categorical Perception.Stevan Harnad - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group. pp. 67--4.
The Phenomenal Character of Experience.Sydney Shoemaker - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2).
The Primary Objects of Perception.David H. Sanford - 1976 - Mind 85 (April):189-208.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
109 ( #48,620 of 2,210,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #154,247 of 2,210,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature