Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):411-414 (2004)

In this paper I run a 'marginal cases' type argument against Machan's claim that moral agents ought to be able to use animals.
Keywords Animal rights  Rights  Perfectionism  Argument from marginal cases
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10790-005-5319-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Putting Humans First? [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):85 - 104.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sterba on Machan's "Concession".Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):241–243.
Capitalism, Freedom and Rhetoric: A Reply to Tibor R. Machan.Alan Haworth - 1989 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):97-108.
Initiative: Human Agency and Society.Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Hoover Institution Press.
Abusing Science.Charles F. Kielkopf - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (1):110-118.
The Paradigm Case Argument: Abusing and Not Using the PCA.Antony Flew - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (1):115–121.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #321,666 of 2,326,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #105,497 of 2,326,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes