Using and abusing others: A reply to Machan [Book Review]

Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):411-414 (2004)
In this paper I run a 'marginal cases' type argument against Machan's claim that moral agents ought to be able to use animals.
Keywords Animal rights  Rights  Perfectionism  Argument from marginal cases
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10790-005-5319-6
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sterba on Machan's "Concession".Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):241–243.
Capitalism, Freedom and Rhetoric: A Reply to Tibor R. Machan.Alan Haworth - 1989 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):97-108.
Initiative: Human Agency and Society.Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Hoover Institution Press.
Abusing Science.Charles F. Kielkopf - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (1):110-118.
The Paradigm Case Argument: Abusing and Not Using the PCA.Antony Flew - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (1):115–121.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
21 ( #241,096 of 2,180,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,815 of 2,180,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums