Using and abusing others: A reply to Machan [Book Review]

Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):411-414 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I run a 'marginal cases' type argument against Machan's claim that moral agents ought to be able to use animals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sterba on Machan's "concession".Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):241–243.
The right to private property: Reply to Friedman.Tibor R. Machan - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):97-106.
Capitalism, Freedom and Rhetoric: a reply to Tibor R. Machan.Alan Haworth - 1989 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):97-108.
Initiative: human agency and society.Tibor R. Machan - 2000 - Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Abusing Science. [REVIEW]Charles F. Kielkopf - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (1):110-118.
The paradigm case argument: Abusing and not using the PCA.Antony Flew - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (1):115–121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#422,001)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Hadley
Western Sydney University

Citations of this work

Nature of dignity and human dignity.Vasil Gluchman - 2017 - Human Affairs 27 (2):131-144.
Putting Humans First? [REVIEW]Nathan Nobis - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):85 - 104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why human beings may use animals.Tibor R. Machan - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (1):9-16.

Add more references