Ciceronian Officium and Kantian Duty

Review of Metaphysics 75 (4):667-706 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we examine the genealogy and transmission of moral duty in Western ethics. We begin with an uncontroversial account of the Stoic notion of the kathēkon, and then examine the pivotal moment of Cicero’s translation of it into Latin as ‘officium’. We take a deflationary view of the impact of Cicero’s translation and conclude that his translation does not mark a departure from the Stoic ideal. We find further confirmation of our deflationary position in the development of the notion of ‘duty’ in Germany between the 16th and 18th centuries. We examine Pufendorf’s critique of ancient eudaimonism and his appropriation of officium, and claim that it foreshadows Kant’s rejection of Garve’s Ciceronian ethics. We demonstrate the undeniable parallels between Kant’s Groundwork and Garve’s influential translation of Cicero’s De Officiis, thereby indicating a novel way in which we should understand Cicero’s contribution to the development of modern moral philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-28

Downloads
812 (#24,186)

6 months
234 (#10,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andree Hahmann
Tsinghua University
Michael Vazquez
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references