Is this what the debate on rules was about?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The key weakness of the proposed distinction between rules and similarity is that it effectively converts what was previously seen as a consequence of rule or similarity-based processing, into a definition of rule and similarity themselves – evidence is elevated into a conceptual distinction. This conflicts with fundamental intuitions about processes and erodes the relevance of the debate across cognitive science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#445,254)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ulrike Hahn
Birkbeck College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references