Religious Studies 36 (4):377-400 (2000)
This paper recasts the normative shape of Fear and Trembling by presenting an ‘ethical reading’ based on an ethic of care. It will be argued that Abraham's response represents a commitment to sustain and deepen his fundamental relationship with God, to make absolute his relation to the Absolute. Since most readers tend to focus myopically on ‘the trial’ itself, apart from the context and history of the God-relationship, the proffered interpretations tend inevitably to distort the nature and significance of Abraham's form of life. By remembering the pattern of attachment between God and Abraham, I think that a different normative picture will emerge, one which can be expressed in the grammar of care.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Abraham in a Different Voice: Rereading "Fear and Trembling" with Care.Jung H. Lee - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (4):377 - 400.
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling.John Lippitt - 2003 - Routledge.
Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work.Jerome I. Gellmann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Self-Deception, Confusion, and Salvation in "Fear and Trembling" with "Works of Love".Amy Laura Hall - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):37 - 61.
Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling.Andrew Cross - 2003 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):3 – 28.
Enough is Enough! "Fear and Trembling" is Not About Ethics.Ronald M. Green - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):191-209.
Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling" in Logical Perspective.Edmund N. Santurri - 1977 - Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):225 - 247.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #495,901 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?