Philosophy 36 (136):30 - 48 (1961)
Authors | |
Abstract |
In an earlier paper I have attempted to show, among other things; that the names of human artifacts and man-devised activities and processes involve in their uses the notion of some end-in-view, function, or use , which partially regulates these uses. In this paper I shall limit myself to a somewhat detailed discussion of one very important class of such common names which requires a separate treatment. I mean art-names
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0031819100057818 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Are Bad Works of Art 'Works of Art'?Cyril Barrett - 1972 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 6:182-193.
Similar books and articles
Against the Sociology of Art.Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):206-218.
Comparative Aesthetic Judgments and Kant's Aesthetic Theory.Donald W. Crawford - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (3):289-298.
Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art.Murray W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-10
Total views
19 ( #579,716 of 2,499,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,740 )
2010-08-10
Total views
19 ( #579,716 of 2,499,740 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,740 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads