BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-14 (2016)

Abstract
BackgroundPublic involvement activities are promoted as measures for ensuring good governance in challenging fields, such as biomedical research and innovation. Proponents of public involvement activities include individual researchers as well as non-governmental and governmental organizations. However, the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement deserves more attention by researchers because it is not purely theoretical: it has important practical functions in the guidance, evaluation and translation of public involvement activities.DiscussionThis article focuses on collective agency as one property a public as a small group of participants in a public involvement activity could exhibit. It introduces a prominent theoretical approach to collective agents as one specific kind of social entities and demonstrates how this approach can be applied to current practice in public involvement activities. A brief discussion of different types of representation as they are used in the existing literature on this topic is also included because representation and collective agency can be closely related to each other. Suggestions and ideas that are derived from this reasoning include the proposal to use a ‘validity check’ for the generation of collective agents as a regular element of certain types of public involvement activities, the consequences of combining collective agency and representativeness as a further property a public could exhibit, and standards for reporting the content of public involvement activities in scientific publications.SummaryThis article discusses the importance of the concept of ‘public’ in public involvement activities, with a focus on biomedical research and innovation. It introduces various practically relevant ideas that are based on a theoretical analysis of collective agency as an important property a public can possess
Keywords Collective agency  Public involvement  Representation
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genomics and Public Involvement: Giving Justifications Their Due.Gabriele Badano - 2012 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 6 (1).
Professionals and the Public: Power or Partnership in Health Research?Lisa Robinson, Julia Newton & Pam Dawson - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (2):276-282.
Public Companies as Social Institutions.Janice Dean - 2001 - Business Ethics 10 (4):302–310.
A Communitarian Approach to Public Health.John E. Ataguba & Gavin Mooney - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (2):154-164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-06

Total views
22 ( #471,585 of 2,411,494 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,494 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes