Finance Depends on Resistance, Finance is Resistance, and Anyway, Resistance is Futile

Mediations 26 (1-2) (2012)

What would the resistance to financialization look like? What if the concept of resistance is already a deeply flawed one? What if finance already depends on resistance to continue its expansion? What if finance is already a form of resistance? Max Haiven argues that we need to constitute a new political rhetoric that more accurately names our political circumstances
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Abstract.[author unknown] - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):299-303.
Abstract.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):447-449.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Back to Hegel?Robert Pippin - 2012 - Mediations 26 (1-2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #896,109 of 2,498,773 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,773 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes