Inquiry 41 (1):21 – 43 (1998)
Two kinds of intrinsically valuable entities are distinguished - those that are ends-in- themselves (and therefore sacred) and those that are intrinsically good. It is suggested that it is the individual rather than the group that is sacred in the primary sense. To be sacred or an end-in-itself implies that the sacred entity must not be replaced by a potential entity even if more good can be promoted by doing so. It is suggested that only entities that have an irreducible consciousness should be candidates for the sacred in the primary sense. If so, it would follow that groups are not sacred in the primary sense unless perhaps one regards them as unitary beings. It is argued that though groups have rights that are not reducible to the rights of individuals, this is consistent with the view that the ultimate justification of these rights is provided by an appeal to the interests of the relevant individuals; groups can be derivatively sacred. Activities of collectives can sometimes be intrinsically good, and such considerations, too, would be relevant to deciding upon which collectives should be retained and which modified or replaced.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Are There Universal Collective Rights?Miodrag A. Jovanović - 2010 - Human Rights Review 11 (1):17-44.
Similar books and articles
Moral Horror and the Sacred.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1995 - Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (2):201 - 224.
Self-Consciousness and the Rights of Nonhuman Animals and Nature.Richard A. Watson - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (2):99-129.
The Complexity of Groups: A Comment on Jorge Valadez.Martha Nussbaum - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):57-69.
“Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2011 - Journal of Ethics 15 (3):265-280.
The Universal Pretensions of Cultural Rights Arguments.Jeff Spinner‐Halev - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (2):1-25.
Minority Rights and the Preservation of Languages.Anthony Ellis - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (2):199-217.
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #163,846 of 2,158,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #86,888 of 2,158,669 )
How can I increase my downloads?