Classical Quarterly 34 (1):83-88 (1984)

Authors
Stephen Halliwell
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
Interest in νομαστìκωμδєȋν began early. Even before the compilation of prosopo-graphical κωμδούμєνο in the second century B.C., Hellenistic study of Aristophanes had devoted attention to the interpretation of personal satire. The surviving scholia contain references to Alexandrian scholars such as Euphronius, Eratosthenes and Callistratus which show that in their commentaries and monographs these men had dealt with issues of νομαστì κωμδєȋν Much material from Hellenistic work on Old Comedy was transmitted by later scholars, particularly by Didymus and Symmachus in their variorum editions, and was eventually embodied in the scholia, though of course in an abridged and sometimes distorted form. Many of our fragments of Old Comedy, preserved in the scholia or in medieval works of reference as parallels to passages in Aristophanes, are direct evidence of the long ancient tradition of interest in the genre's large element of personal satire. What we find in the scholia should not therefore be treated as representative only of the latest and most derivative stages of ancient scholarship. It is the purpose of this article to argue that the scholia on Aristophanes allow us to see that in matters of νομαστì κωμδєȋν certain assumptions about the nature of this type of comic material were persistently made by ancient scholars, and that certain interpretative habits were consequently developed from them. It is my further aim to suggest that this pattern of interpretation has been widely but unjustifiably perpetuated in later work on Aristophanes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800029311
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Chapter In The History of Scholia.N. G. Wilson - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (2):244-256.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Diviners and Divination in Aristophanic Comedy.Nicholas D. Smith - 1989 - Classical Antiquity 8 (1):140-158.
Aristophanes Vs. Socrates.Don Adams - 2014 - Dialogue 53 (4):691-713.
The Five Talents Cleon Coughed Up.Edwin M. Carawan - 1990 - Classical Quarterly 40 (1):137-147.
Names and Naming in Aristophanic Comedy.S. Douglas Olson - 1992 - Classical Quarterly 42 (2):304-319.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Later Comic Chorus.K. J. Maidment - 1935 - Classical Quarterly 29 (1):1-24.
The Later Comic Chorus.K. J. Maidment - 1935 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):1-.
A Chapter In The History Of Scholia1.N. Wilson - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (2):244-256.
The Manuscripts of Aristophanes, Knights.D. Jones - 1952 - Classical Quarterly 2 (3-4):168-185.
Aristophanes' Apprenticeship.Stephen Halliwell - 1980 - Classical Quarterly 30 (01):33-.
Aristophanes and Kallistratos.Douglas M. Macdowell - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (1):21-26.
Review Article: Comedy.I. A. Ruffell - 2012 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 132:157-171.
Scholia on Aristophanes. [REVIEW]K. J. Dover - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (1):6-8.
Plato’s Dionysian Music?Jacob Howland - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47.
The Scholia on Aristophanes. [REVIEW]Colin Austin - 2001 - The Classical Review 51 (1):18-19.
Zacher's Scholia of Aristophanes. [REVIEW]W. Gunion Rutherford - 1890 - The Classical Review 4 (9):406-408.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
26 ( #375,872 of 2,329,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes