Addiction, neuroscience and ethics

Addiction 98 (7):867-870 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If one believes that the brain is, in some as yet unspecified way, the organ of mind and behaviour, then all human behaviour has a neurobiological basis. Neuroscience research over the past several decades has provided more specific reasons for believing that many addictive phenomena have a neurobiological basis. The major psychoactive drugs of dependence have been shown to act on neurotransmitter systems in the brain (Nutt 1997; Koob 2000); common neurochemical mechanisms underlie many of the rewarding effects of these drugs and the phenomena of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms (Hyman & Malenka 2001; Koob 2000), and there is evidence for a genetic vulnerability to addiction (Nestler 2001; Uhl 1999) that is mediated by genes that regulate the metabolism of psychoactive drugs and the brain neurotransmitter systems on which they act (Uhl 1999).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#179,190)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wayne Hall
State University of New York (SUNY)

Citations of this work

Responding Ethically to Patient and Public Expectations About Psychiatric DBS.Eric Racine & Emily Bell - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (1):21-29.
Letters to the Editor.Ian Nicholson - 2011 - Philosophy Now 87 (3):36-38.

Add more citations