Counterfactual analysis: Can the metalinguistic theory be revitalized?

Synthese 81 (1):47 - 62 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper evaluates the recent trend to renounce the similarity approach to counterfactuals in favor of the older metalinguistic theory. I try to show, first, that the metalinguistic theory cannot work in anything like its present form (the form described by many in the last decade who claim to be able to solve Goodman''s old problem of cotenability). This is so, I argue, because the metalinguistic theory requires laws of nature of a sort that we (apparently) do not have: current physical theory cannot underwrite the metalinguistic theory. Second, I draw from the first point a motivation for the similarity approach, a motivation based on theoretical considerations apart from the standard ones of pretheoretical intuition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#161,723)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John F. Halpin
Oakland University

Citations of this work

The Miraculous Conception of Counterfactuals.John F. Halpin - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 63 (3):271 - 290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1974 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.

View all 17 references / Add more references