Complexity provides a better explanation than probability for confidence in syllogistic inferences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):91-91 (2009)

Abstract
Bayesian rationality is an important contribution to syllogistic inference, but it has limitations. The claim that confidence in a conclusion is a function of informativeness of the max-premise is anomalous because this is the least probable premise. A more plausible account is that confidence is inversely related to complexity. Bayesian rationality should be supplemented with principles based on cognitive complexity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X09000363
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Psychology.Jean Piaget - 1953 - New York: Basic Books.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-13

Total views
41 ( #214,822 of 2,280,299 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #85,993 of 2,280,299 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature