Complexity provides a better explanation than probability for confidence in syllogistic inferences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):91-91 (2009)
Abstract
Bayesian rationality is an important contribution to syllogistic inference, but it has limitations. The claim that confidence in a conclusion is a function of informativeness of the max-premise is anomalous because this is the least probable premise. A more plausible account is that confidence is inversely related to complexity. Bayesian rationality should be supplemented with principles based on cognitive complexity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X09000363
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Logic and Psychology.Jean Piaget - 1953 - New York: Basic Books.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-02-13

Total downloads
31 ( #171,361 of 2,197,364 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,197,364 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature