Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):91-91 (2009)
Bayesian rationality is an important contribution to syllogistic inference, but it has limitations. The claim that confidence in a conclusion is a function of informativeness of the max-premise is anomalous because this is the least probable premise. A more plausible account is that confidence is inversely related to complexity. Bayesian rationality should be supplemented with principles based on cognitive complexity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Four Probability-Preserving Properties of Inferences.Ernest W. Adams - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):1 - 24.
The Role of Training, Alternative Models, and Logical Necessity in Determining Confidence in Syllogistic Reasoning.Jamie A. Prowse Turner & Valerie A. Thompson - 2009 - Thinking and Reasoning 15 (1):69 – 100.
The Development of Deductive Reasoning: How Important is Complexity?Graeme S. Halford & Glenda Andrews - 2004 - Thinking and Reasoning 10 (2):123 – 145.
On the Computational Complexity of the Numerically Definite Syllogistic and Related Logics.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):1-28.
The Functions of Fossils: Inference and Explanation in Functional Morphology.D. Turner - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (1):193-212.
Added to index2009-02-13
Total downloads31 ( #163,888 of 2,158,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,783 of 2,158,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?