Authors
Jb Manchak
University of California, Irvine
Hans Halvorson
Princeton University
Abstract
The hole argument purportedly shows that spacetime substantivalism implies a pernicious form of indeterminism. We show that the argument is seductive only because it mistakes a trivial claim (viz. there are isomorphic models) for a significant claim (viz. there are hole isomorphisms). We prove that the latter claim is false -- thereby closing the debate about whether substantivalism implies indeterminism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
New Work For a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - In D. H. Mellor & Alex Oliver (eds.), Properties. Oxford University Press.
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Hole Argument?Hans Halvorson & J. B. Manchak - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
The Hole Argument.John D. Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):329-350.
The Hole Argument.Oliver Pooley - forthcoming - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics. Routledge.
Einstein's Hole Argument.Alan Macdonald - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:223-225.
Regarding ‘Leibniz Equivalence’.Bryan W. Roberts - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (4):250-269.
Einstein Algebras and the Hole Argument.Jonathan Bain - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.
Holes in Spacetime: Some Neglected Essentials.Trevor Teitel - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (7):353-389.
Determinism and Modality.Carolyn Brighouse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):465-481.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-04

Total views
55 ( #198,184 of 2,462,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #15,439 of 2,462,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes