PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:193 - 199 (1990)
In virtue of what does a representational state have the content it does? Several philosophers have recently proposed that a representational state gets its content from its biological function. After explaining the sense of biological function used in these views, I criticise the proposal. I argue that biological function only determines representational content up to extensional equivalence. I maintain that this holds even if biological function is defined in terms of an intensional notion like Sober's "selection for".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Burge on Representation and Biological Function.Agustín Vicente - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):125-133.
Norms for Emotions: Biological Functions and Representational Contents.Matteo Mameli - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (1):101-121.
Biological Functions and Perceptual Content.Mohan P. Matthen - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (January):5-27.
The Scientific Use of 'Representation' and 'Function': Avoiding Explanatory Vacuity.Joel Kenton Press - 2008 - Synthese 161 (1):119 - 139.
Four Notions of Biological Function.Arno G. Wouters - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):633-668.
Fitness and Function.D. M. Walsh - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.
Four Notions of Biological Function.Arno Wouters - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (4):633-668.
From Natural Function to Indeterminate Content.S. R. Sullivan - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):129-37.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads16 ( #301,299 of 2,177,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,892 of 2,177,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?