Focus restored: Comments on John MacFarlane

Synthese 170 (3):457 - 482 (2009)

In “Double Vision Two Questions about the Neo-Fregean Programme”, John MacFarlane’s raises two main questions: (1) Why is it so important to neo-Fregeans to treat expressions of the form ‘the number of Fs’ as a species of singular term? What would be lost, if anything, if they were analysed instead as a type of quantifier-phrase, as on Russell’s Theory of Definite Descriptions? and (2) Granting—at least for the sake of argument—that Hume’s Principle may be used as a means of implicitly defining the number operator, what advantage, if any, does adopting this course possess over a direct stipulation of the Dedekind-Peano axioms? This paper attempts to answer them. In response to the first, we spell out the links between the recognition of numerical terms as vehicles of singular reference and the conception of numbers as possible objects of singular, or object-directed, thought, and the role of the acknowledgement of numbers as objects in the neo-Fregean attempt to justify the basic laws of arithmetic. In response to the second, we argue that the crucial issue concerns the capacity of either stipulation—of Hume’s Principle, or of the Dedekind-Peano axioms—to found knowledge of the principles involved, and that in this regard there are crucial differences which explain why the former stipulation can, but the latter cannot, play the required foundational role.
Keywords Dissertation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9261-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford University Press.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Meaning.Paul Horwich - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Science Without Numbers.Hartry Field - 1980 - Princeton University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
A Dilemma for Neo-Fregeanism.Robert Trueman - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):361-379.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #83,127 of 2,291,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #146,497 of 2,291,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature