Killing, Letting Die, and the Denial of Resources

Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (2003)

Authors
Timothy Hall
Wilfrid Laurier University
Abstract
The traditional non-consequentialist moral distinction between doing and allowing harm should be revised. A trichotomy consisting of what I call central cases of harming, refraining from aiding, and denying resources is more apt way of distinguishing behaviors. ;I argue that there are morally significant differences between denial behaviors and each of the other two categories of behavior. I first employ what has been called the method of comparable cases in support of this conclusion. I also provide a second argument by appealing to a conjunction of claims held by many non-consequentialists: a commitment to stringent, pre-political rights persons have over mindedness as to the correct principles of justice in distribution of external resources. Denial behaviors are distinct from the other two behaviors, I argue, because their moral status is determined by principles of justice in distribution to an extent to which the moral status of the other behaviors is not. ;I apply the distinction between denying resources and the other two categories of behavior to many outstanding applied topics, such as abortion, euthanasia, punishment, and what has been called the problem of ducking harm. For example, I provide a novel objection to the claim that abortion is permissible even if a fetus is a moral person. The personhood of the fetus will protect it against the initiation of attacks common in abortion, I argue, but not against the withdrawal of aid contemplated in Judith Thomson's famous violinist example
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Doing Harm, Allowing Harm, and Denying Resources.Timothy Hall - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):50-76.
On the Moral Relevance of the Distinction Between Killing and Letting Die.Young-mo Koo - 1997 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Killing, Letting Die and Euthanasia.D. N. Husak - 1979 - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (4):200-202.
Active and Passive Euthanasia.Natalie Abrams - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (204):257 - 263.
The Ethics of Abortion.Marc Alan Gellman - 1981 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
Moral Inertia.Carolina Sartorio - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes