Knowledge of possibility and of necessity

I investigate two asymmetrical approaches to knowledge of absolute possibility and of necessity--one which treats knowledge of possibility as more fundamental, the other according epistemological priority to necessity. Two necessary conditions for the success of an asymmetrical approach are proposed. I argue that a possibility-based approach seems unable to meet my second condition, but that on certain assumptions--including, pivotally, the assumption that logical and conceptual necessities, while absolute, do not exhaust the class of absolute necessities--a necessity-based approach may be able to do so.
Keywords Absolute, Epistemology, Knowledge, Necessity, Possibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00061.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,193
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding and Essence.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
Modal Epistemology.Stephen K. McLeod - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (3):235-245.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
212 ( #26,119 of 2,309,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #65,459 of 2,309,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature