Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):1–20 (2002)
I investigate two asymmetrical approaches to knowledge of absolute possibility and of necessity--one which treats knowledge of possibility as more fundamental, the other according epistemological priority to necessity. Two necessary conditions for the success of an asymmetrical approach are proposed. I argue that a possibility-based approach seems unable to meet my second condition, but that on certain assumptions--including, pivotally, the assumption that logical and conceptual necessities, while absolute, do not exhaust the class of absolute necessities--a necessity-based approach may be able to do so.
|Keywords||Absolute, Epistemology, Knowledge, Necessity, Possibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Modal Epistemology, Modal Concepts and the Integration Challenge.Sonia Roca-Royes - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):335-361.
Similar books and articles
Modal Epistemology: Our Knowledge of Necessity and Possibility.Simon Evnine - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):664-684.
On Categories and A Posteriori Necessity: A Phenomenological Echo.M. J. Garcia-Encinas - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):147-164.
Abduction and Modality.Stephen Biggs - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):283-326.
Conceivability, Possibility, and a Posteriori Necessity: On Chalmers' Argument for Dualism.Karol Polcyn - 2006 - Diametros 7 (March):37-55.
Possibility, Necessity, and Existence: Abbagnano and His Predecessors.Nino Langiulli - 1992 - Temple University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads180 ( #24,543 of 2,158,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #23,311 of 2,158,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?