Several writers have argued recently that optimal rules of law authorize morally suboptimal decisions in certain cases.1 Larry Alexander calls these “gap cases.”2 Should judges in gap cases defer to legal rules or deviate from them? Philosophers known as “formalists” favor deference, “particularists” favor deviation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging.Jeffrey Brand-Ballard - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.
The "Weak Law":Contaminations and Legal Cultures (Borrowing of Legal and Political Forms).P. G. Monateri - unknown
'Correctness, Not Fairness:' Formalism and Institutional Norms in the NBA.Jonathan Yovel - manuscript
Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules.Jean D' Aspremont - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Is Legal Positivism as Worthless as Many Italian Scholars of Public Law Depict It?Stefano Civitarese Matteucci - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (4):505-539.
Human Rights, Citizen Rights: The Presuppositions of the American and European Case Law.Gregory Lewkowicz - unknown
Similarity of Legal Cases: From Temporal Relations of Affairs. [REVIEW]Satoshi Tojo & Katsumi Nitta - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):161-176.
Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions: Lausanne, 10-11 September 2009.Eleanor Cashin-Ritaine, Seán Patrick Donlan & Martin Sychold (eds.) - 2010 - Schulthess.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads24 ( #210,564 of 2,168,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?