Zygon 17 (1):9-18 (1982)
AbstractThis paper is a critique of the theory of meaning in art and religion that Michael Polanyi developed in his last work entitled Meaning. After giving a brief summary of Polanyi’s theory of art, I raise two serious difficulties, not with the theory itself, but with the claims Polanyi makes about the relation of meaning in art to science and religion. Regarding the first difficulty, I argue that Polanyi betrays an earlier insight when in Meaning he attempts to dissociate meaning in art from meaning in science; instead I argue that both science and art are aesthetic enterprises. Regarding the second, I argue that Polanyi’s account of religion is an aesthetic reduction, that meaning in religion, at least in the Western tradition, is not so much an aesthetic as it is an existential matter
Similar books and articles
Questioning Polanyi's meaning: A response to Ronald hall.Bruce Haddox - 1982 - Zygon 17 (1):19-24.
Science and reality, religion and God: A reply to Harry Prosch.Richard Gelwick - 1982 - Zygon 17 (1):25-40.
The Christian Encounter of Paul Tillich and Michael Polanyi.Richard Gelwick - 2008 - Tradition and Discovery 35 (3):7-20.
The question of a religious reality: Commentary on the Polanyi papers.William T. Scott - 1982 - Zygon 17 (1):83-87.
Torrance on Polanyi and Polanyi on God.John V. Apczynski - 1997 - Tradition and Discovery 24 (1):32-34.
Polanyi's view of religion in personal knowledge: A response to Richard Gelwick.Harry Prosch - 1982 - Zygon 17 (1):41-48.
Between Articulation and Symbolization.Robert E. Innis - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (1):8-20.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads