Nomic necessity and empiricism

Noûs 33 (4):630-643 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX


character. So, we have learned from early on that laws are meant to portray a sort of necessity in nature. The comings and goings described by law are not merely contingently related. Rather, it is part of the concept of law that these events are connected in some significant way: "nomically" connected. One important desideratum for an account of law, then, is that it respect and perhaps explain this modal character.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanation and laws.Alexander Bird - 1999 - Synthese 120 (1):1--18.
Interfering with nomological necessity.Markus Schrenk - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):577-597.
Humean supervenience and best-system laws.Lydia Jaeger - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):141 – 155.


Added to PP

191 (#104,543)

6 months
6 (#528,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John F. Halpin
Oakland University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references