Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):803-831 (1998)

Abstract
Working memory limits are best defined in terms of the complexity of the relations that can be processed in parallel. Complexity is defined as the number of related dimensions or sources of variation. A unary relation has one argument and one source of variation; its argument can be instantiated in only one way at a time. A binary relation has two arguments, two sources of variation, and two instantiations, and so on. Dimensionality is related to the number of chunks, because both attributes on dimensions and chunks are independent units of information of arbitrary size. Studies of working memory limits suggest that there is a soft limit corresponding to the parallel processing of one quaternary relation. More complex concepts are processed by or In segmentation, tasks are broken into components that do not exceed processing capacity and can be processed serially. In conceptual chunking, representations are to reduce their dimensionality and hence their processing load, but at the cost of making some relational information inaccessible. Neural net models of relational representations show that relations with more arguments have a higher computational cost that coincides with experimental findings on higher processing loads in humans. Relational complexity is related to processing load in reasoning and sentence comprehension and can distinguish between the capacities of higher species. The complexity of relations processed by children increases with age. Implications for neural net models and theories of cognition and cognitive development are discussed
Keywords capacity limits   chunking   cognitive development   comparative psychology   complexity   neural nets   relations   representations   resources   working memory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x98001769
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Attention and Effort.Daniel Kahneman - 1973 - Prentice-Hall.

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 79 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Relational Complexity a Useful Metric for Cognitive Development?Usha Goswami - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):838-839.
What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed?Nelson Cowan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
332 ( #21,690 of 2,348,315 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #21,949 of 2,348,315 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes