Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):279-293 (2020)

Authors
Keith Hankins
Chapman University
Daniel Halliday
University of Melbourne
Abstract
Philosophical discussions of positional goods typically focus on parties competing for shares of such goods and on the inequalities among them that both shape and arise from these competitions. Les...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2019.1620816
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,792
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Priority and Position.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):341-360.
Private Education, Positional Goods, and the Arms Race Problem.Daniel Halliday - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (2):150-169.
Feminism, Agency and Objectivity.Adelin Dumitru - 2018 - Public Reason 10 (1):81-100.
Positional Goods and the Size of Inequality.Tammy Harel Ben Shahar - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (1):103-120.
Minor Goods and Objective Theories of Well-Being.Christopher Rice - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (2):221-231.
Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental Ethics.John Nolt - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):162 – 182.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-03

Total views
47 ( #202,097 of 2,342,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #41,932 of 2,342,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes