Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):304-323 (2002)
Defining the real numbers by abstraction as ratios of quantities gives prominence to then- applications in just the way that Frege thought we should. But if all the reals are to be obtained in this way, it is necessary to presuppose a rich domain of quantities of a land we cannot reasonably assume to be exemplified by any physical or other empirically measurable quantities. In consequence, an explanation of the applications of the reals, defined in this way, must proceed indirectly. This paper explains the main complications involved and answers the main objections advanced in Batitsky's paper in this issue.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What is Neologicism?Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.
Similar books and articles
A Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem: III. Von Neumann Algebras as the Base Category.John Hamilton, Chris Isham & Jeremy Butterfield - unknown
Quantities, Magnitudes, and Numbers.Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (3):377-410.
Numbers as Quantitative Relations and the Traditional Theory of Measurement.Joel Michell - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):389-406.
The Analytic Versus Representational Theory of Measurement: A Philosophy of Science Perspective.Zoltan Domotor & Vadim Batitsky - 2008 - Measurement Science Review 8 (6):129-146.
A New Applied Approach for Executing Computations with Infinite and Infinitesimal Quantities.Yaroslav D. Sergeyev - 2008 - Informatica 19 (4):567-596.
Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns About Hale's ‘Reals by Abstraction';.Vadim Batitsky - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):286-303.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #103,757 of 2,178,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,623 of 2,178,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?