Reincarnation redux

Philosophia 28 (1-4):359-367 (2001)
Authors
Steven Hales
Bloomsburg University
Abstract
This paper is a rejoinder to Robert Almeder's "On Reincarnation: A Reply to Hales". I argue that even if we stipulate the case studies of the reincarnationists to be good data, the explanatory hypothesis of reincarnation is a deus ex machina. Without a comprehensive scientific or philosophical theory of the mind that embeds the reincarnation hypothesis, the view should not be taken seriously. The fact that reincarnation is the first explanation of the case studies that comes to mind says more about us and our culture than it does about which explanations are the most probable ones.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Ethics   Philosophy of Language   Philosophy of Mind   Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/BF02379786
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,457
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intuition, Revelation, and Relativism.Steven D. Hales - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):271 – 295.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
58 ( #110,283 of 2,285,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #231,908 of 2,285,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature