Trans-Religious Dancing Dialogues: Michel Henry on Dionysus and the Crucified
Culture and Dialogue (forthcoming)
Abstract
Perhaps owing to frictions between his Christological worldview and the dominant secularism of contemporary French thought as taken up in the U.S., and persistent worries about a seeming solipsism in his phenomenology, Michel Henry's innovative contributions to aesthetics have received unfortunately little attention in English. The present investigation addresses both issues simultaneously with a new interpretation of his recently-translated 1996 interview, “Art and Phenomenology.” Inspired by this special issue’s theme, “French Thought in Dialogue,” it emphasizes four levels of dialogue in the interview, as follows: (1) the interview as such, with Brohm; (2) its titular dialogue between art and phenomenology; (3) what I term a “trans-religious” dialogue between Christianity’s Jesus and Nietzsche’s Dionysus; and (4) a related dialogue between painting (Henry’s favored genre) and dance that is “Dionysian” (in Nietzsche’s sense). It concludes with new phenomenological accounts of a literal and a figurative dance, namely the social Latin dance called bachata, and an improvised musical dialogue with the mockingbirds of my hometown. In sum, thanks to Henry’s engagement with various forms of dialogue, including with Brohm, the arts, paganism, and dance, one can find room in his transcendental subjectivity of Life for others, dancingly transcending even humanity.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nietzsche as Philosopher of Religion.Joseph Closter Thompson - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dance of Dionysus: The Body in Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Music.John Carvalho - 2003 - International Studies in Philosophy 35 (3):101-116.
Is There a Flesh Without Body?Emmanuel Falque - 2016 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 24 (1):139-166.
On the Centrality of Dionysus in Nietzsche’s Philosophy.Kieran Stewart - 2015 - The European Legacy 20 (4):349-359.
Newton contra Alt-right Nietzsche: Dionysus as Androgynous Black Panther.Joshua M. Hall - 2020 - The Pluralist 15 (2):110-128.
Michel Henry Et l'Affect de L'Art: Recherches Sur l'Esthétique de la Phénoménologie Matérielle.Adnen Jdey & Rolf Kühn (eds.) - 2011 - Brill.
Dionysus versus the Crucified One: Nietzsche's Understanding of the Apostle Paul.Jörg Salaquarda - 1998 - In Daniel W. Conway (ed.), Nietzsche: Critical Assessments. Routledge. pp. 266--291.
The consolation of philosophy or 'neither dionysus nor the crucified'.Howard Caygill - 1994 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 7:131-150.
Le bonheur de Spinoza, suivi de Étude sur le spinozisme de Michel Henry, coll. « Épiméthée ».Michel Henry & Jean-Michel Longneaux - 2005 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 195 (2):234-235.
Antiquity as echo and disguise: Nietzsche's “lied eines theokritischen ziegenhirten,” Heinrich Heine, and the crucified dionysus.Reinhold Grimm - 1985 - Nietzsche Studien 14 (1):201.
„Gespräche mit Dionysos“. Nietzsches Rätselspiele.Claus Zittel - 2018 - Nietzsche Studien 47 (1):70-99.
Antiquity as echo and disguise: Nietzsche’s “lied eines theokritischen ziegenhirten,” Heinrich Heine, and the crucified dionysus.Reinhold Grimm - 1985 - Nietzsche Studien 14:201-249.
The Contemplative Self After Michel Henry, by Joseph Rivera. [REVIEW]Steven DeLay - 2016 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 19 (1).
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-08-18
Downloads
101 (#124,542)
6 months
38 (#35,085)
2021-08-18
Downloads
101 (#124,542)
6 months
38 (#35,085)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Michel Henry’s Concept of Life.Simon Jarvis - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):361 - 375.
Kandinsky's Composition VI: Heideggerian Poetry in Noah's Ark. Hall - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (2):74-88.
Black holes and revelations: Michel Henry and jean‐luc Marion on the aesthetics of the invisible.Peter Joseph Fritz - 2009 - Modern Theology 25 (3):415-440.