Philosophy of Science Supplement 63 (3):125-33 (1996)

The standard adaptationist explanation of the presence of a sensory mechanism in an organism--that it detects properties useful to the organism--cannot be given for color vision. This is because colors do not exist. After arguing for this latter claim, I consider, but reject, nonadaptationist explanations. I conclude by proposing an explanation of how color vision could have adaptive value even though it does not detect properties in the environment
Keywords Color  Evolution  Perception  Science  Vision
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289944
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,786
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Color Realism and Color Science.Alex Byrne & David R. Hilbert - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):3-21.
Color Realism Redux.Alex Byrne & David R. Hilbert - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):52-59.
Have Byrne & Hilbert Answered Hardin's Challenge?Adam Pautz - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):44-45.
Why Not Color Physicalism Without Color Absolutism?Zoltán Jakab & Brian P. McLaughlin - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):34-35.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #200,158 of 2,425,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,682 of 2,425,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes