Public Affairs Quarterly 9 (4):317-320 (1995)
There are two main ways to understand unconditional love. I argue that one is impossible (i.e., no one could love that way) and the other is probably irrational. This has important consequences in a variety of domains. Social policies have been derided on the grounds that they undermine unconditional love, and it has been called "possibly the most valuable aspect of the Christian tradition". The works of Robert Nozick, Elizabeth Anderson, and Richard Taylor on this topic are examined and criticized.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
“Impersonalismus” Und Die “Werdende Vernunft der Wahrheit” in Solov'evs Spätphilosophie.Peter Ehlen - 1999 - Studies in East European Thought 51 (3):155-175.
Forgiveness Without Apology.Karen D. Hoffman - 2008 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:135-151.
Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love.Sharon Krishek - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Selecting Potential Children and Unconditional Parental Love.John Davis - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):258–268.
Reading Medea Nad Hecuba: The Tragic in Unconditional Love.Karin Melis - 2005 - Dialogue and Universalism 15 (1-2):203-210.
Added to index2011-01-06
Total downloads123 ( #39,121 of 2,164,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,058 of 2,164,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?