Transcending the Debate between Inclusive and Exclusive Legal Positivists

According to the standard positivist picture of law, each legal system contains a master rule that specifies criteria of legality for primary rules.1 A central debate in legal philosophy during the past twenty-five years has concerned the content of the master rule. Exclusive positivists insist that the master rule can only make reference to social facts or sources: “pedigree” criteria.2 As Ronald Dworkin emphasizes, however, some rulings can’t be justified exclusively by reference to pedigreed legal norms.3 Judges sometimes exercise.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.
The Boundaries of Law and the Purpose of Legal Philosophy.Danny Priel - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (6):643 - 695.
On the Concept and the Nature of Law.Robert Alexy - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (3):281-299.
Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism.Jules L. Coleman - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (3):359-394.
The Question of Validity of Law.Friday N. Ndubuisi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:61-66.
Kelsen, Quietism, and the Rule of Recognition.Michael Steven Green - 2008 - In Matthew D. Adler & Kenneth E. Himma (eds.), THE RULE OF RECOGNITION AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
17 ( #293,198 of 2,197,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature