This paper is a philosophically informed contribution to debate about the values that might inform and be communicated by a further education. It includes a historical review of the concern of colleges of further education with economic and personal development that was reflected in the distinction between vocational and liberal studies. This distinction is seen to arise out of a mistaken epistemology which attempts to distinguish once and for all as it were, objective facts from subjective values. As instrumentalism came to dominate the further education sector, the idea of liberal studies became obsolete and the sector might now appear to some commentators to be little concerned with values other than those of a monetary kind. The paper is focused on a traditional conception of further education colleges as places where people learn practices such as plumbing, joinery and hairdressing. It is argued that the distinction between academic and vocational practices is not based on the logic of the practices, but on the primary purpose of the person who is making the distinction. Practices such as plumbing, joinery and hairdressing are value laden as, more obviously, are other practices such as literary criticism and feminist pedagogy. The idea that the former type of practices are somehow value free and in need of additional study in moral competence or life skills is mistaken. Instead it is argued that all practices are evaluative and that an induction into any practice is bound to be a form of values education.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00071005.1996.9974058
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,276
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

From a Logical Point of View.W. V. O. Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
Personal Knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knowledge and Human Interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1978 - Heinemann Educational.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Values Education and the Right to Privacy.Alan L. Lockwood - 1977 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):9-26.
Synergies and Balance Between Values Education and Quality Teaching.Terence J. Lovat - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (4):489-500.
Values Education in a Democratic Society.Graham Haydon - 1993 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 12 (1):33-44.
Non-Coercive Promotion of Values in Civic Education for Democracy.Allyn Fives - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (6):577-590.
Values Education: Sustaining the Ethical Environment.Graham Haydon * - 2004 - Journal of Moral Education 33 (2):115-129.
Moral Education in a Liberal Society.Eamonn Callan - 1985 - Journal of Moral Education 14 (1):9-22.
Values Education ‐‐ Some New South Wales Experiences.A. J. Hepworth - 1979 - Journal of Moral Education 8 (3):193-201.
Values and Further Education.John Halliday - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (1):66-81.


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #653,505 of 2,419,614 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,667 of 2,419,614 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes