Explication, explanation, and history

History and Theory 47 (2):183–199 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


To date, no satisfactory account of the connection between natural-scientific and historical explanation has been given, and philosophers seem to have largely given up on the problem. This paper is an attempt to resolve this old issue and to sort out and clarify some areas of historical explanation by developing and applying a method that will be called “pragmatic explication” involving the construction of definitions that are justified on pragmatic grounds. Explanations in general can be divided into “dynamic” and “static” explanations, which are those that essentially require relations across time and those that do not, respectively. The problem of assimilating historical explanations concerns dynamic explanation, so a general analysis of dynamic explanation that captures both the structure of natural-scientific and historical explanation is offered. This is done in three stages: In the first stage, pragmatic explication is introduced and compared to other philosophical methods of explication. In the second stage pragmatic explication is used to tie together a series of definitions that are introduced in order to establish an account of explanation. This involves an investigation of the conditions that play the role in historiography that laws and statistical regularities play in the natural sciences. The essay argues that in the natural sciences, as well as in history, the model of explanation presented represents the aims and overarching structure of actual causal explanations offered in those disciplines. In the third stage the system arrived at in the preceding stage is filled in with conditions available to and relevant for historical inquiry. Further, the nature and treatment of causes in history and everyday life are explored and related to the system being proposed. This in turn makes room for a view connecting aspects of historical explanation and what we generally take to be causal relations.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanation and laws.Alexander Bird - 1999 - Synthese 120 (1):1--18.
An explication of 'explication'.Joseph F. Hanna - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44.
On the eliminative explanation of social theories.Raimo Tuomela - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):331 - 345.
Kant’s Explication and Carnap’s Explication.Giovanni Boniolo - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):289-298.
Explication or Explanation?Giovanni Stanghellini & Mario Rossi Monti - 2009 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 16 (3):237-239.
Covering laws in historical practice.Sten Spam Nikon - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):445-463.
The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology.Derek Turner - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (1):193-212.


Added to PP

82 (#205,812)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Hammer
Normandale Community College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
Explanatory unification.Philip Kitcher - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (4):507-531.
The function of general laws in history.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):35-48.
Explanation, conjunction, and unification.Philip Kitcher - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (8):207-212.
Two Approaches to Explanation.Philip Kitcher - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (11):632.

View all 10 references / Add more references