Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge

Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):221-265 (1995)
A representation methodology for knowledge allowing multiple interpretations is described. It is based on the following conception of legal knowledge and its open texture. Since indeterminate, legal knowledge must be adapted to fit the circumstances of the cases to which it is applied. Whether a certain adaptation is lawful or not is measured by metaknowledge. But as this too is indeterminate, its adaptation to the case must be measured by metametaknowledge, etc. This hierarchical model of law is quite well-established and may serve well as a basis for a legal knowledge system. To account for the indeterminacy of law such a system should support the construction of different arguments for and against various interpretations of legal sources. However, automatizing this reasoning fully is unsound since it would imply a restriction to arguments defending interpretations anticipated at programming time. Therefore, the system must be interactive and the user''s knowledge be furnished in a principled way. Contrary to the widespread opinion that classical logic is inadequate for representing open-textured knowledge, the framework outlined herein is given a formalization in first order logic.
Keywords multiple interpretation  open texture  vagueness  schemata  metalogic programming  metalogic knowledge representation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00871851
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - Courier Dover Publications.
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.Alfred Tarski - 1943 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3):341-376.
Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems.T. J. M. Bench-Capon & F. P. Coenen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):65-86.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Using Argument Schemes for Hypothetical Reasoning in Law.Trevor Bench-Capon & Henry Prakken - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):153-174.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems.T. J. M. Bench-Capon & F. P. Coenen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):65-86.
Model for Knowledge and Legal Expert Systems.Anja Oskamp - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):245-274.


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #132,030 of 2,313,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #110,841 of 2,313,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature