Hume's (Berkeleyan) Language of Representation

Hume Studies 41 (2):171-200 (2015)

Authors
Nabeel Hamid
Concordia University
Abstract
Although Hume appeals to the representational features of perceptions in many arguments in the Treatise, his theory of representation has traditionally been regarded as a weak link in his epistemology. In particular, it has proven difficult to reconcile Hume's use of representation as causal derivation and resemblance (the Copy Principle) with his use of representation in the context of impressions and abstract ideas. This paper offers a unified interpretation of representation in Hume that draws on the resources of Berkeley's doctrine of signs. On this account, while the Copy Principle still occupies the core of Hume's "content empiricism," the manner in which any perception represents is understood as involving a relation of sign to thing signified. A sign/signified interpretation has the virtue of allowing Hume to remain within the strictures of his empiricism, while underwriting the various senses in which an impression or idea could possess content. Such an interpretation is not only adequate to account for the role that mental representations play in everyday behavior, but also for the purposes of elaborating the foundations of civil society that are Hume's concern in Book 3 of the Treatise.
Keywords representation  signification  Berkeley  sign theory  Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015, 2017
DOI 10.1353/hms.2015.0008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hume on Sense Impressions and Objects.Marina Frasca-Spada - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:13-24.
A Puzzle About Hume's Theory of General Representation.David Landy - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):257-282.
Hume on the Stoic Rational Passions and "Original Existences".Jason R. Fisette - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (4):609-639.
Hume's Puzzle About Identity.Donald L. M. Baxter - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 98 (2):187-201.
Hume’s Theory of Mental Representation.David Landy - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (1):23-54.
Hume's Unified Theory of Mental Representation.Karl Schafer - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):978-1005.
Hume and the Mechanics of Mind : Impressions, Ideas, and Association.David Owen - 2009 - In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
Hume's Nominalism and the Copy Principle.Ruth Weintraub - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):45-54.
Hume’s Impression/Idea Distinction.David Landy - 2006 - Hume Studies 32 (1):119-139.
Three Questions About Treatise 1.4.2.Georges Dicker - 2007 - Hume Studies 33 (1):115-153.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-08

Total views
108 ( #74,923 of 2,271,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #39,226 of 2,271,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature