Music and the aural arts

British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):46-63 (2007)

Authors
Andy Hamilton
Durham University
Abstract
The visual arts include painting, sculpture, photography, video, and film. But many people would argue that music is the universal or only art of sound. In the modernist era, Western art music has incorporated unpitched sounds or ‘noise’, and I pursue the question of whether this process allows space for a non-musical soundart. Are there non-musical arts of sound—is there an art phonography, for instance, to parallel art photography? At the same time, I attempt a characterization of music, contrasting acoustic, aesthetic, and acousmatic accounts. My view is that there is some truth in all of these. I defend the claim that music is an art with a small ‘a’—a practice involving skill or craft whose ends are essentially aesthetic, that especially rewards aesthetic attention—whose material is sounds exhibiting tonal organization. But acoustic and acousmatic accounts help to distinguish between music and non-musical soundart, since music must have a preponderance of tones for its material.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayl038
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,373
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Natural Sounds and Musical Sounds: A Dual Distinction.John Dyck - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3):291-302.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
104 ( #82,740 of 2,286,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #318,915 of 2,286,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature