Second person neuroscience needs theories as well as methods

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):425-426 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Advancing second-person neuroscience will need strong theories, as well as the new methods detailed by Schilbach et al. I assess computational theories, enactive theories, and cognitive/information processing theories, and argue that information processing approaches have an important role to play in second-person neuroscience. They provide the closest link to brain imaging and can give important insights into social behaviour

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroscience, the person, and God: An emergentist account.Philip Clayton - 1999 - In Zygon. Notre Dame: University Notre Dame Press. pp. 613-652.
Neuroscience and the person: scientific perspectives on divine action.Robert J. Russell (ed.) - 1999 - Berkeley (USA): Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.
No Nonsense Neuro-law.Sarah K. Robins & Carl F. Craver - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):195-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?