Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”

Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Toulmin’s formulation of “analytic arguments” in his 1958 book, The Uses of Argument, is opaque. Commentators have not adequately explicated this formulation, though Toulmin called it a “key” and “crucial” concept for his model of argument macrostructure. Toulmin’s principle “tests” for determining analytic arguments are problematic. Neither the “tautology test” nor the “verification test” straightforwardly indicates whether an argument is analytic or not. As such, Toulmin’s notion of analytic arguments might not represent such a key feature of his model. Absent a clearer formulation of analytic arguments, readers of Toulmin should be hesitant to adopt this terminology



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,869

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Uses of Argument in Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.
Cartesian analyticity.Jesús A. Díaz - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55.
Respondeo: Method and content in casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Analytic/synthetic.Richard Swinburne - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):31 - 42.
Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory.James B. Freeman - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Toulmin on ideals of natural order.Richard L. Purtill - 1971 - Synthese 22 (3-4):431 - 437.
Analytic’ reading, ‘continental’ text: The case of Derrida’s ‘on forgiveness.Chris Kaposy - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):203 – 226.


Added to PP

31 (#384,535)

6 months
1 (#483,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Hamby
Coastal Carolina University

References found in this work

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
Introduction.Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Peter Charles Menzies - 2009 - In Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press.
On a proposed revolution in logic.Hector Neri Castaneda - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (3):279-292.

View all 6 references / Add more references