Against Legal Punishment

In Matthew C. Altman (ed.), Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment. Palgrave (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that legal punishment is morally wrong because it’s too morally risky. I first briefly explain how my argument differs from similar ones in the philosophical literature on legal punishment. Then I explain why legal punishment is morally risky, argue that it’s too morally risky, and discuss objections. In a nutshell, my argument goes as follows. Legal punishment is wrong because we can never sufficiently reduce the risk of doing wrong when we legally punish people. We can never sufficiently reduce this risk because wrongful punishment is much worse than wrongful non-punishment and because punishment’s permissibility depends on the answers to a variety of difficult philosophical questions about which we’re fallible.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Facing the Consequences.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):589-604.
The Immorality of Punishment: A Reply to Levy.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):113-122.
The Problem of Punishment.David Boonin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Justice and Legal Punishment.James F. Doyle - 1967 - Philosophy 42 (159):53 - 67.
Retributivism Revisited.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):473-484.
Retributive Parsimony.Richard L. Lippke - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-04

Downloads
111 (#110,559)

6 months
32 (#34,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Hanna
Drexel University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations